Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Carlos A. Afonso |
Date: | Thu, 4 Nov 2010 12:06:22 -0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Good point, Jorge.
--c.a.
On 11/04/2010 11:50 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
> Dear Adam,
>
> just for clarification, I'm not interested in the "person", just the
> "office" being represented by the person.
>
> Just trying to understand and learn what interests lay in ICANN's
> governance behind the intellectual property administration of the AAMC
> and how that particular constituency is or not being represented
> within the current ICANN sctructure.
>
> Regards
> Jorge
>
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Adam Peake<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Dear Jorge,
>>
>>
>> At 6:43 AM -0500 11/4/10, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Amber,
>>>
>>> please, can you add to the list an answer explaining as a representative
>>> of AAMC
>>> how much experience and participation did you have in ICANN and its policy
>>> development processes and what is the actual role of the Intellectual
>>> property
>>> administration and protection office at AAMC ?
>>
>>
>> Why is this relevant?
>>
>> Constituency we're interested in, not the person, surely.
>>
>> Adam
>
--
Carlos A. Afonso
====================================
new/nuevo/novo e-mail: [log in to unmask]
====================================
|
|
|