Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:46:52 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Why? It does not change the positions of the letter (favoring nasty
closed generics). But it does change the debate to something more
respectful and less vitriol. Not a reason to sign on - but a reason to
support the process of disagreement...
Kathy
> Seems a good suggestion to me.
>
> will people sign on if it is changed?
>
> avri
>
> On 4 Mar 2013, at 23:09, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
>
>> Hi people, I generally agree. I suggest we do not use derisive expressions like "We find these claims to be hysterical...".
>>
>> frt rgds
>>
>> --c.a.
>>
>> On 03/04/2013 06:22 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>>> Dear NCSG members:
>>>
>>> A group of us, including so far Robin Gross, Avri Doria, Andrew Adams, Nicolas Adam and Brenden Kuerbis, have developed a comment with ICANN on the closed generic issue.
>>> You can read our comments at this Google docs link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tPuEELJ2y6-d0hwF_qPupQb0V5OEFpqkMwcApDRNZf0/edit?usp=sharing
>>> We can still add names to the list of supporters, or you could file a quick and easy individual comment with ICANN expressing your support for the statement after it comes out.
>>>
>>> Milton L. Mueller
>>> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
>>> Internet Governance Project
>>> http://blog.internetgovernance.org
>>>
--
|
|
|