Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) |
Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:23:32 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Cheryl,
Thanks for clarifying your thinking, I was pretty confused in the
meeting by your prior explanation of how you expected this to work. I
would strongly encourage you to file an amendment to your submission
to the board so that they too will have a better understanding of what
you are proposing.
Best,
Bill
On Mar 3, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Cheryl Preston wrote:
> I understand there is some confusion about exactly what I had in
> mind when I mentioned the possibility of a six constituency NCSG
> model. This is the exact statement I mentioned.
>
>
> Cheryl B. Preston
> Edwin M. Thomas
> Professor of Law
> J. Reuben Clark Law School
> Brigham Young University
> 434 JRCB
> Provo, UT 84602
> (801) 422-2312
> [log in to unmask]<Tentative Proposals v2.doc>
***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
[log in to unmask]
New book: Governing Global Electronic Networks,
http://tinyurl.com/5mh9jj
***********************************************************
|
|
|