Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:38:30 +0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thanks andrew,
It provides information about the filter used by the Chinese government ?
But probably not answering about how effective this filter/sensor are ?
Regards, Rudi Rusdiah
On 01/14/2011 07:56 AM, Andrew A. Adams wrote:
> Rudi asked:
>
>> How effective is a filter and any body know how effective the Chinese
>> government filter political content ?
>>
> The main aim of the PRC government has been to suppress discussion in Chinese
> between Chinese citizens. They long ago realised that their system was not
> going to be perfect and adopted a "chilling effect" approach combining
> blocking of external websites which contain things likely to promote
> discussion of political change in China and blocking Chinese-language web
> fora where the government was criticised or "democracy on the Western model"
> for China was being promoted or discussed, together with high profile arrest
> and prosecution for persistent online critics resident in China. The
> anti-porn elements seem mainly to be used as a smokescreen for their
> political goals, as a way to justify their general filtering technology and
> other regulations of, e.g. Internet cafes, and to distract Chinese people
> from these political issues by creating a moral panic.
>
> (BTW, any chance of you learning how to use the shift key? English is much
> easier to read when it includes standard capitalisation at the start of
> sentences.)
> --
> Professor Andrew A [log in to unmask]
> Professor at Graduate School of Business Administration, and
> Deputy Director of the Centre for Business Information Ethics
> Meiji University, Tokyo, Japanhttp://www.a-cubed.info/
>
>
>
|
|
|