NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 05:36:55 -0700
Reply-To:
Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From:
Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
I will agree with you that I also share the opinion that the Red Cross 
should be nominated for sainthood. The question is though - should that 
be a reason for special privileges?

So - let's play a game here. What other organizations would qualify for 
special privileges, and what would be the rules for granting them? After 
all, if we start playing favorites don't we invite lawsuits or at least 
accusations of cronyism? It this going to be an arbitrary process based 
on feeling good? I'm a fan of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. I'm 
sure many of you are as well. Do we give them the .eff TLD? Based on how 
I feel - I would. But why does how we feel matter?

Even calling it "special privileges" in itself bothers me. There has to 
be some sort of policy that makes sense so that the process is fair.

On 10/5/2011 4:21 AM, warigia bowman wrote:
> I personally approve of giving special privileges to the Red Cross/Red 
> Crescent, but not to the IOO.
>
> The Red Cross is one of the only organizations I trust when I do 
> fundraising for famine in East Africa.
>
> Thanks, Rigia
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2