You're not being dense. You're being formal. Not always the same thing.
;-)

Basically since there is more to do at any moment than there are people
willing to do them, whenever someone (like you) volunteers to get
involved and someone else (like Frannie) already is involved (via her
PIR advisory board role) it makes sense to nab those people and form an
informal TF which makes a policy recommendation. If we wait for the
official Policy Committee to act, nothing may ever happen. 

>>> Danny Younger <[log in to unmask]> 9/25/2006 2:35:35 PM >>>
Hi Milton,

I am somewhat confused by your reference to Frannie...

The NCUC Charter indicates:  

"The Constituency shall have a Policy Committee (PC)
which shall be responsible for determining and
representing the positions of the Constituency on
matters of domain name and ICANN policy" and;

"The Policy Committee Co-Chairs shall consult with the
Constituency to develop policy positions"

As the Policy Committee is chaired by the reps to the
Council, my orginal message on this topic was copied
to our three councillors.  

Is there a process step that I am missing?

Sorry to be so dense early on a Monday morning...


--- Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I did miss that, thanks. OK, making a proposal is
> step 1, can you get
> some buy-in from Frannie on it? 
> 
> >>> Danny Younger <[log in to unmask]> 9/24/2006
> 6:18:20 PM >>>
> Milton,
> 
> As a counterproposal to the PIR Restocking Fee Plan
> I
> proposed the elimination of the add grace period. 
> The
> complete first draft of the proposal has already
> been
> submitted (perhaps you missed it).  The URL is here:
> 
> (see the link at the borrom of the page)
>
http://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0609&L=ncuc-discuss&T=0&F=&S=&P=12131

> 
> 
> Danny


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com