NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Non-Commercial User Constituency <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Dan Krimm <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:37:06 -0700
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Dan Krimm <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
They have more money than we do.  We had a concerted campaign for gTLDs but
not for Whois; I guess they must have taken the example of KTCN and decided
to play ball ("we'll show them...").

The question now is what ICANN (i.e., Kieren) will do with all the
comments.  If they handle the summarizing differently than for gTLDs (which
was relatively perfunctory) we have a double standard.  Not that ICANN
seems to care about that.

Dan


At 11:41 AM -0700 10/24/07, Danny Younger wrote:
>Another orchestrated campaign by the Intellectual
>Property Community -- see the posts at
>http://forum.icann.org/lists/whois-comments-2007/index.html
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2