Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:33:15 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 21 Jan 2013, at 16:48, Robin Gross wrote:
> Therefore now have a 24-hour period to ask the two NCSG candidates questions and to provide them with initial feedback about desired outcomes for the ATRT (using this list beginning now).
>
Thanks Robin, for opening this topic.
I think that the AOC reviews are among the most important work we do outside of Policy recommendations. And I think that the ATRT - being responsible for reviewing, and then recommending improvements on, the accountability and transparency of ICANN is central to any evolution we might someday see ICANN and its ability to become a free standing dynamic organization.
Even if this list does not have any specific questions for the two of us who have asked for the NCSG endorsement, I would really like to hear about issues that are currently on people's minds about the specific issues that need to be covered by the upcoming review.
Thanks
avri
Ps: Dan, I remember that I owe you an answer on Dynamic Organizational Architectures which includes the issue of accountability. While I am still working on that theoretical answer, in a practical sense, I think that accountable and transparent Accountability and Transparency Reviews, are a key ingredient.
|
|
|