NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Nuno Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:46:00 +0800
Reply-To:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: [npoc-voice] Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Notes from NCSG-EC Teleconference on 8 November 2011
From:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines) 
On 16/11/2011, at 7:27 AM, Nuno Garcia wrote:

> Hi all.
> 
> I think we had agreed on that not-for-profit is different of non-commercial. 
> 
> I see no reason why NPOC could not support a Chamber of Commerce application - this clearly falls within the scope of "non-profit" organization. 

	NPOC members have to be NCSG members. So being a non-profit, even a non-profit with 'operational concerns', is not enough, you have to be non-Commercial, and commercial non-profits, as defined in NCSG charter 2.2.1.4, are not permitted to be members of NCSG. 
	Regards
		David

ATOM RSS1 RSS2