Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:34:03 +0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Of course not. But I do not believe we have any organisations who focus on that area as their policy concern. Nor have any individuals identified that as a policy area they focus on. So if we do, it is their business, and not ours, until they choose to make it relevant.
Regards
David
On 04/02/2013, at 1:13 PM, Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> On 2/3/2013 8:59 PM, David Cake wrote:
>> I have friends who run sex worker activism NGOs (including one that is sex worker run by charter). Next time I see them I'll ask if they want to join NCUC. I think they'd be perfectly welcome here, and would fit in, but I'm not sure how much of a policy priority ICANN issues might be for them (but hey, .xxx, IFFOR, legal restrictions on advertising in some jurisdictions, etc - maybe they do have enough to justify their participation, I don't know).
>>
>>
>
> Are you sure there aren't any sex workers already on NCUC?
>
|
|
|