Mawaki:
I have made comments related to at-large and on the ALAC public list,
as i believe the issue related to that constituency should be
discussed there. If you haven't read the plethora of messages that
have been posted in the last 24 hours - please do so.
I'll just say this in my defense - please, know the facts and what
the existing process is before commenting. The decision - at the
moment - is ONLY the prerogative of the ALAC representatives. Should
ALAC and/or a regional RALO wish to change that, then they are free
to do so ..
Turning to NCUC, let me clarify my earlier email in regards to
serving on the NCUC executive as the north american representative...
I would like to propose..ie nominate.. that a representative of
CPSR serve on the excom. If there's an issue with me being that
representative, then by all means let me know - more then happy to
find another member willing to perform the task.
regards,
Robert
---
Robert Guerra <[log in to unmask]>
Managing Director, Privaterra
Tel +1 416 893 0377
On 29-Sep-07, at 1:35 PM, Mawaki Chango wrote:
> All,
>
> In my view, Danny has a point, and this discussion is of
> interest to NCUC given the role that Robert has played, and and
> the even greater one that he is apparently called to play in the
> future in this constituency.
>
> Elections, or any mechanisms for designating representatives are
> due processes, at least in the 21st century. I am not aware that
> this should be done by co-optation, not matter for what "good"
> reasons one may think of. I agree that a candidate who has been
> duly nominated and seconded should compete with her challengers
> for the public vote, unless your processes give the discretion
> to one person, based on informal discussions, to designate the
> ultimate competitors.
>
> It is my impression that that kind of practices are not an
> accident (e.g., secret deals for which prominent members on this
> constituencies have always and rightfully blamed ICANN for,
> along with patterns of selectively replying to people/emails
> that one pleases while questions of public or common interest
> are raised.) This constituency should pay careful attention to
> the responsibilities it entrusts individuals involved in those
> practices.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mawaki
>
>
> --- Danny Younger <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Robert,
>>
>> Rigging an election by removing qualified candidates
>> and then introducing your own candidate into the mix
>> without anyone on the NARALO discussion list being
>> made aware of that candidacy is not a stellar
>> demonstration of "process"; your actions demonstrate
>> an abuse of authority and a callous disregard for the
>> views and concerns of the NARALO membership -- and
>> yes, your integrity is at issue.
>>
>> Integrity means adherence to ethical principles.
>> Denying a qualified candidate the opportunity to be
>> voted upon is unethical and is unfair to the
>> candidate.
>>
>> --- Robert Guerra <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Danny ,
>>>
>>> Your tone, comments, choice of words and personal
>>> nature of your
>>> attacks are well abusive and not constructive in the
>>> least.
>>>
>>> WHO did i consult with - well, people in at large as
>>> well experts
>>> that I know who know ICANN well. Wendy and Bret
>>> being one of many
>>> persons I consulted about the nomcom candidates.
>>> Their comments were
>>> very helpful. I will not say more.
>>>
>>> please - represent my words well.... I did not state
>>> who i consulted
>>> with. In fact, I did NOT at any time consult with
>>> ICANN staff nor any
>>> of its representatives. To say so, i see as a
>>> personal attack on my
>>> integrity.
>>>
>>> I do not appreciate personal attacks - and prefer to
>>> focus my limited
>>> time on more respectful discussion, one that leads
>>> to constructive
>>> change. I have explained the process , stated my
>>> views and leave it
>>> at that.
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>> Robert
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ______________
>> Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from
>> someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
>> http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469
>>
|
