Avri, Konstantinos, Robin and Mary,

Thank you so much for working on this draft under such a tight deadline.


I have not had the opportunity to discuss with my NPOC colleagues, but
after my review this morning, I think it would be best if this was
submitted as a NCUC statement, or perhaps a joint statement between NCUC
and the proposed Consumer Const, if they approve.  I think it is
important for this viewpoint to be shared, even if I and my NPOC
colleagues do not support the conclusions and content.  I would ask that
you clearly state the statement does not represent those of the members
of the Proposed Not-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency.

From the perspective of a non-profit organization that needs effective
and efficient and reasonable means to execute and protect its
philanthropic, capacity-building and humanitarian activities online
(underscored by nefarious activity occurring now related to the disaster
in Japan and the pacific area) I have serious concerns supporting the
positions taken related to Section 6, among other areas - although I
acknowledge the difference in perspectives.  

Thanks,
Debbie
   


-----Original Message-----
From: Avri Doria [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 11:58 AM
To: [log in to unmask] Committee
Cc: NCSG Members List
Subject: [ncsg-policy] Draft of statement for workshop on new gTLDs

Hi,

With some help and some editing, I have the draft of the statement I
intend to use, should a statement be what is mandated.

https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Board-GAC+Workshop+S
corecard+March+2011

I have not finished the table at the bottom  yet, but will be working on
that during the meeting.

Please discuss the wording, and in so far as we have consensus or rough
consensus on wording changes, I will make changes.  The views in this
have been generated from previous positions NCSG has taken in statements
and elsewhere.  The original ratings were done with the help of
Konstantinos and Robin.  They have been reviewed by Mary.


a.