Hi all.

I don't have a strong opinion on this. The motivation for opening new
gTLDs should be of interest and discussion, not the gTLDs by
themselves.

As someone pointed out here, many users don't even remind the address
of a specific website, only the keywords that work for them in a
specific search engine.

Now a different issue may rise if a gTLD is not approved by the wrong
reasons, or if one reaches the conclusion that too many gTLDs is
prejudicial to the Internet Community (as I once read). But from my
point of view, this is only so if it allows the users to be confused
(e.g. .pt and .por - simple off the tips of my fingers example). In
this particular case, unless all domains under .pt were to me migrated
to under .por also, I would oppose to such gTLD.

Warm regards,

Nuno Garcia


On 30 September 2011 08:21, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> As I have not been able to get a conference call scheduled yet, I am starting the question process.  I suggest that all candidates answer all questions.  I suggest that they feel free to debate among themselves and with the members of the NCSG.
>
> Thanks
>
> Avri
>
>
> Question 6: What are you views on the new gTLD program that is scheduled to begin accepting applications in Jan 2012.  What, if anything, should be changed in this round?  What, if anything, should be changed in the next round?