Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:38:53 +0300 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
indeed Alex, but I don't see this as being in the interest of
non-commercials nor in the public interest in the larger sense.
WHOIS is only useful if one can get useful information from it!
Regards,
McTim
On 1/23/12, Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Isn't NCSG list a vehicle for advancing non-commercial interests?
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 8:26 PM, McTim <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> On 1/23/12, Konstantinos Komaitis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> > So how does my proposal for submitting this set of comments as a NCSG
>> > position manifests that I 'try to obtain benefits for myself'? I think
>> there
>> > is something wrong here with your sense of smelling.
>>
>> I didn't mean you personally...You asked if anyone had any objection,
>> and I raised mine.
>>
>> I'm not a big fan of obfuscation of contact details in WHOIS, and
>> can't see that non-commercials are in any way more or less special per
>> this requirement than anyone else!
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>>
>> McTim
>> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
>> route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
>>
>
--
Cheers,
McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
|
|
|