NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Konstantinos Komaitis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Konstantinos Komaitis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:54:30 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (62 lines)
Dear Bill and Rafik,

Thank you for this. Kathy suggested and I feel is a great idea, we submit
comments on the way the IRT was chosen and conducted the whole process of
trademark protection. This falls within item 11 in the review team questions
posted on the socialtext site.

PIR supports this and I think it beneficial to expose a process which
failed to meet the minimum standards of accountability and transparency.
Remember that the IRT was highly comprised by trademark representatives,
non-commercial users were not invited and there we even some peculiar
confidentiality issues in place.

KK


On 12/06/2010 10:10, "William Drake" <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Hello again,
> 
> After playing with different options, Rafik and I decided to put the ATRT
> questions on the Social Text site.  He's posted them at
> https://st.icann.org/ncsg-ec/index.cgi?atrt_questionaire.   Any and all member
> responses to whichever questions you feel like addressing would be very
> helpful.
> 
> Thanks much,
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:31 AM, William Drake wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> As has been mentioned on the list a few times over the past couple of weeks,
> there's a lot going on now with respect to the Review Team mechanism set up in
> accordance with the Affirmation of Commitments, e.g.
> 
> 
>  1.  Council last night took up the motion to approve the GNSO endorsement
> process.  https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?10_june_motions  Alas,
> unexpected complications, the IPC wants an amendment that would make the
> process more formal, political, and time consuming without in my view adding
> any value‹basically to ensure that if the Council decides to endorse any
> additional people in order to increase the diversity of GNSOs nominees, it can
> only do so from a small subset that the SGs have specified in advance rather
> than the whole applicant pool, so as to maximize SG control an

-- 
Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
Lecturer in Law,
GigaNet Membership Chair,
University of Strathclyde,
The Lord Hope Building,
141 St. James Road,
Glasgow, G4 0LT,
UK
tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306
email: [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2