Ps.  and any of the groups or individuals can endorse anything anyone else submits, as they please either with or without additional comment.

So there are multiple ways to get your viewpoints in.

cheers.

a.




On 21 Jul 2010, at 11:26, Avri Doria wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Well we certainly don't have time for a vote, and this does fall under their responsibility for a NCSG statement as defined in the charter we approved.
> 
>> Discussion and development of substantive policies and statements issued in the name of the NCSG. This activity will require coordination with the membership and the Interest-Groups;
> 
> 
> Of course the constituency and candidate constituency/interest-groups can also submit one under their names according to their various procedures.
> 
> And the individuals can submit, under their names and the names of their organizations.
> 
> a.
> 
> On 21 Jul 2010, at 11:18, Wendy Seltzer wrote:
> 
>> Thanks Avri.
>> 
>> Group, what procedures do we want to follow for submitting comments, especially for those due today on DAG4 (where we have several distinct segments)?  Should we each submit what we've written individually, and follow up with NCSG endorsement if the policy council approves? (as Avri suggested in response to another thread)
>> 
>> --Wendy
>> 
>> On 07/21/2010 11:08 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>>> hi,
>>> 
>>> just did a quick update of the comment list on the wiki
>>> 
>>> https://st.icann.org/ncsg-ec/index.cgi?comment_periods_and_volunteers
>>> 
>>> noticed a lot of things were ending today.  tough there have been a few extensions in general.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> a.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Wendy Seltzer -- [log in to unmask]
>> Fellow, Silicon Flatirons Center at University of Colorado Law School
>> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
>> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
>> http://www.chillingeffects.org/
>> https://www.torproject.org/
>