NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:36:50 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
my third and last comment.

a.


Begin forwarded message:

> From: Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 22 July 2010 00:36:14 EDT
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Objection and Dispute Resolution Procedures as Denial of Service attack
> 
> 
> The objection procedures as currently defined could act as a Denial of Service, or even a Distributed Denial of Service attack against an applicant.
> 
> In the case of an applicant who is challenged by many similar objections, while it is possible for them to be consolidated, there is no provision for an extension of time while the consolidation is being considered.  Even seven days while waiting for the consolidation decision is 1/4 of the time available to respond. In the case of a very large number of objections, this may be punitive in effect and may prevent the applicant from completing all the responses in the required time.
> 
> Additionally if a very large number of similar but non consolidated objections are submitted, it may be impossible for the applicant to respond to all of the objections, with each one requiring a separate response and a separate fee; i.e the DDOS attack.  The many to one relationship between possible objectors and a single applicant is an inherent scaling problem in the application process that needs to be addressed with modified time limits and batch costing.
> 
> Avri Doria
> Individual Comment

ATOM RSS1 RSS2