Bill,
see: 'Policy Development Process Work Team Initial Report & Draft
Recommendations'
(PDP-WT - Initial Report - Final - 31 May 2010.pdf)
https://st.icann.org/icann-ppsc/index.cgi?pdp_team
- - -
3. Delivery of Recommendations to the Board
Recommendation 39.
The PDP-WT recommends that the GNSO Council is responsible for the
Board Report either as author of the report or to approve the report
before it is sent to the Board. The PDP-WT discussed at length the
current practice of ICANN Policy Staff submitting a separate report to
the Board which is never disclosed to the community, noting that this
is not directly related to the PDP, and unanimously believe that this
practice should no longer continue.
Reports on PDPs should be delivered from the GNSO Council directly to
the Board and if any summaries are needed, that should be the
responsibility of the Council with the help of the Working Group (if
necessary). The PDP-WT has discussed ways in which to make the report
more focused and easier to digest, but has not agreed on a possible
recommendation in relation to this issue yet and hopes to receive
further input on this issue during the public comment period.
https://st.icann.org/data/workspaces/icann-ppsc/attachments/pdp_team:20100728095715-0-21071/original/PDP-WT%20-%20Initial%20Report%20-%20Final%20-%2031%20May%202010.pdf
regards,
Alex
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:55 PM, William Drake
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Oct 5, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Wendy Seltzer wrote:
>
>> On the upside, I don't think Council is actually voting on anything
>> beyond "RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council acknowledges that the VI Working
>> Group is unable to achieve a consensus by the Board requested date of 8
>> October 2010;" and sending its letter to the board.
>
> Correct.
>>
>> I'm inclined to vote in favor.
>>
> Me too
>
> So that's that...
>
>>
>>
>> On 10/05/2010 08:27 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In general, I am willing, my primary concern is that we cover the areas that the council members will be voting on. We have already been informed of 2 council members who can't make it, it we switch the issues, then that make 3 council members who are missing for the meat of the meeting which is the issue before council at this week's meeting. In scheduling these meetings as we do, including doing doodle polls before the meeting, the primary purpose is to review the issues before the council.
>>>
>>> And I do not know about the other 3 council members either.
>>>
>>> a.
>>>
>>> On 5 Oct 2010, at 07:51, William Drake wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Robin
>>>>
>>>> Alas, I will have to leave the call at 16:00 UTC to get somewhere. As I'm up for election and have offered to coordinate a response to COICA, might it be possible to invert this agenda by switching 3-4 with 1-2?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Bill
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 4, 2010, at 9:23 PM, Robin Gross wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Reminder: Tomorrow, 5 October is the NCSG-NCUC monthly policy discussion. (15:00-17:00 UTC)
>>>>>
>>>>> The meeting is open to all members, so please join in the discussion. Details below. Please let me or Avri know if you need a dial-out for the call.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope you will join!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Robin
>>>>>
>>>>> Mtg Announcement & Agenda:
>>>>> http://ncdnhc.org/events/october-ncsg-open-policy
>>>>> Tuesday, 5 October 2010 at 15:00 - 17:00 UTC
>>>>>
>>>>> The monthly open policy discussions are intended to facilitate direct dialogue between the NCSG membership and the NCSG GNSO Counselors on policy matters pending before the GNSO Counsel (especially those issues going to vote the next day or 2 in the GNSO Counsel).
>>>>>
>>>>> International telephone dial-in information including passcode and country-specific dial-in numbers:
>>>>> http://ipjustice.org/ICANN/NCSG/NCSG_Passcodes.htm
>>>>>
>>>>> --------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Tuesday, 5 October 2010 at 15:00 - 17:00 UTC
>>>>>
>>>>> NCSG Discussion Agenda:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Issues before GNSO Council on 7 Oct.
>>>>> See GNSO Agenda: http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-council-07oct10-en.htm
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. Update on NCSG Charter Status
>>>>>
>>>>> 3. Upcoming Elections (NCSG & NCUC)
>>>>>
>>>>> 4. Combating Online Infringement & Counterfeits (COCIA) & White House Mtg with Registrars.
>>>>> See:
>>>>> http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100929/20293711230/even-without-coica-white-house-asking-registrars-to-voluntarily-censor-infringing-sites.shtml
>>>>>
>>>>> 5. Any other business?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> IP JUSTICE
>>>>> Robin Gross, Executive Director
>>>>> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
>>>>> p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451
>>>>> w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: [log in to unmask]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ***********************************************************
>>>> William J. Drake
>>>> Senior Associate
>>>> Centre for International Governance
>>>> Graduate Institute of International and
>>>> Development Studies
>>>> Geneva, Switzerland
>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>> www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
>>>> www.linkedin.com/in/williamjdrake
>>>> ***********************************************************
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Wendy Seltzer -- [log in to unmask] +1 914-374-0613
>> Fellow, Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy
>> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
>> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
>> http://www.chillingeffects.org/
>> https://www.torproject.org/
>> http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
>
> ***********************************************************
> William J. Drake
> Senior Associate
> Centre for International Governance
> Graduate Institute of International and
> Development Studies
> Geneva, Switzerland
> [log in to unmask]
> www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
> www.linkedin.com/in/williamjdrake
> ***********************************************************
>
|
