Hi,
My problem with that is that the NCSG only has an afternoon schedule. We start at 2 and go until 6. So to take the afternoon slot means cutting down the NCSG by about 90 minutes (coming and going to the Board meeting room included). And assuming the Board-GAC meeting is an open one, I am sure there are people from NCSG (myself included) who will be wanting to attend if at all possible. That could cut NCSG down to a 1.5 hour meeting: 2 - 3:30. On the other hand, there is a possibility that we could be done with the SG meeting between 2:00 - 4:45 - nearly 3 hours and we can go longer if necessary.
True most of issues will have been covered in the morning constituency meeting, but there are some issues that are common NCSG issues, and it would be good for the results of the 3 constituency meetings to be shared with the other NCSG group members.
One other point, the lunch hour is scheduled for 2 hours, so you should still have time for lunch.
Another thing, we need to start thinking of the 3 issues we want to discuss with the Board. What I suggest is that people start suggesting. Once we have a bunch I will create a poll to determine which are the top 3. I suggest we do not include the topic of charters as that can be dealt with seperately with the Structural Improvements Committee at other times.
a.
On 26 Feb 2011, at 11:01, William Drake wrote:
> Hi
>
> If folks prefer lunch ok, but personally I'd favor doing it just before GAC. By then various relevant discussions/ideas will have percolated and hopefully taken more shape so we'd able to make optimal use of the time and mitigate any bored impatience. Plus, in light of the Brussels and follow-on conversations, moving contiguously between the Board and GAC views would be interesting and value-adding.
>
> Bill
>
> On Feb 25, 2011, at 8:16 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> How about asking for 1:00pm – 2:00pm which is the lunch hour between the Constituency meetings and the SG meeting.
>>
>> With as a second choice 3:30pm – 4:30pm right before the GAC.
>>
>> a.
>>
>> On 25 Feb 2011, at 19:54, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>>
>>> That's good - though I'd suggest getting that confirmed in writing somehow so that it doesn't get overlooked when the time comes.
>>>
>>> As for the preferred time for a visit with/from the Board on Constituency Day, I would suggest at earliest the 11 a.m. slot - that will allow stragglers to be in the room on time, we would have "warmed up" and be in discussive mode, and will not be too late for those in Europe attending remotely (since there will be almost no good time for folks in Asia-Pac anyway :(
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Mary
>>>
>>>
>>> Mary W S Wong
>>> Professor of Law
>>> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
>>> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
>>> Two White Street
>>> Concord, NH 03301
>>> USA
>>> Email: [log in to unmask]
>>> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
>>> Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
>>> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>>>>>
>>> From: Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> CC: <[log in to unmask]>, NCSG Policy Committee <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Date: 2/25/2011 1:46 PM
>>> Subject: [ncsg-policy] Re: [ncsg-ec] Re: Fwd: Proposed Changes to Constituency Day - Silicon Valley Meeting - From Peter Dengate Thrush
>>> Once we have more constituencies NCSG will have the same number of opportunities.
>>>
>>> a.
>>>
>>> On 25 Feb 2011, at 19:28, Robin Gross wrote:
>>>
>>>> This new format sounds like a good way to manage the many meetings. Although it is not clear which day is referred to as the massive board mtg day. Is it the new Tuesday?
>>>>
>>>> My only complaint (and its a big one) is that the CSG is given 3 times more opportunities to attend the social events with the board than the NCSG. The social events are rotated to constituencies, not stake-holder groups (unlike the substantive mtgs). This means that all of the members of the NCSG have the same access to the board as the single and small ISP constituency or the small, but powerful IPR constituency. Access to the board at social events should be allocated equally between the CSG and NCSG. This would be a big change in the way ICANN is managed, but it needs to happen if noncommercial users are ever going to have any influence. The second-rate treatment of noncommercial users by ICANN is one of the reasons why it is hard to trust ICANN.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Robin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 25, 2011, at 10:13 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hu,
>>>>>
>>>>> pRease read and make recommendations on what we would like to do. If anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> First come first serve so the sooner the better.
>>>>>
>>>>> a.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Diane Schroeder <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> Date: 25 February 2011 18:58:06 GMT+01:00
>>>>>> To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>, "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>, "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>, Stephane Van Gelder <[log in to unmask]>, Marilyn Cade <[log in to unmask]>, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>, Chris Disspain <[log in to unmask]>, "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>, Olivier Crepin-LeBlond <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> Cc: Rod Beckstrom <[log in to unmask]>, David Olive <[log in to unmask]>, John Jeffrey <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> Subject: Proposed Changes to Constituency Day - Silicon Valley Meeting - From Peter Dengate Thrush
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The following note is being sent on behalf of Peter Dengate Thrush.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As I mentioned to most of you in Cartagena, the Board is proposing a change to the interactions between the various community groups and the Board at the face-to-face meetings. The change is being proposed to try to improve the format for dialogue and make the discussions more focused. The changes will be tried at the March meeting and then reviewed for effectiveness before the June meeting. There are two main changes - the first is to the meetings on Tuesday, Constituency Day. The second is to social events such as dinners, lunches and breakfasts. Attached is a document explaining the changes in detail. Please coordinate the time slots with Diane Schroeder. She will also coordinate the social events. The Board appreciates that these are big changes for the community, but our goal is to enhance the communications between the Board and the SO/ACs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Warmest regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter Dengate Thrush
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Diane Schroeder
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Director of Board Support
>>>>>> ICANN
>>>>>> 4676 Admiralty Way, Ste 330
>>>>>> Marina del Rey, CA 90292
>>>>>> United States
>>>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>>>> Work phone - +1-310-301-5827
>>>>>> Mobile phone - +1-562-644-2524
>>>>>> Fax - +1-310-823-8649
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> <PROPOSED CONSTITUENCY DAY CHANGES FOR THE SILICON VALLEY MEETING.doc>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----
>>>>> Everything about this list: http://info.n4c.eu/sympa/info/ncsg-policy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> IP JUSTICE
>>>> Robin Gross, Executive Director
>>>> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
>>>> p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451
>>>> w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: [log in to unmask]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----
>>>> Everything about this list: http://info.n4c.eu/sympa/info/ncsg-ec
>>>
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Everything about this list: http://info.n4c.eu/sympa/info/ncsg-policy
>>
>>
>> ----
>> Everything about this list: http://info.n4c.eu/sympa/info/ncsg-policy
>
>
|
