Joly: I didn't ask for a transcript. I asked that our representative in Brussels - the one I believe we agreed to support to get there - actually provide us with a report. Bill? --MM ________________________________________ From: [log in to unmask] [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Joly MacFie [[log in to unmask]] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 7:52 PM To: Milton L Mueller Cc: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: GAC-Board meeting in Brussels now scribe notes: http://domainincite.com/docs/ICANN-GAC-consultation-Feb-28-2011-scribe-notes-1.txt http://domainincite.com/docs/ICANN-GAC-consultation-Feb-28-2011-scribe-notes-2.txt http://domainincite.com/docs/ICANN-GAC-consultation-Feb-28-2011-scribe-notes-3.txt http://domainincite.com/docs/ICANN-GAC-consultation-Feb-28-2011-scribe-notes-4.txt http://domainincite.com/docs/ICANN-GAC-consultation-Feb-28-2011-scribe-notes-5.txt http://domainincite.com/docs/ICANN-GAC-consultation-Feb-28-2011-scribe-notes-6.txt On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Would appreciate a report on your impressions. I had time to listen in for > about 45 minutes this morning, mostly about geographic names. My impression > was that the whole discussion was very inconclusive and consisted of > relatively clueless GAC members, e.g. from Germany and UK, reiterating > debates over geographic names that we have been having for years, not > contributing anything new in terms of information or policy and really not > pressing ICANN to make specific changes. GAC members themselves did not seem > of one mind about the issue, although sharing certain “concerns.” But that > was a very small sample of the total interaction, so want to know what you > saw/heard/thought. > > -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org ---------------------------------------------------------------
