Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 3 Aug 2010 21:17:55 -0700 |
In-Reply-To: |
<p06240805c87e92f8f765@[192.168.16.156]> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Brilliant. I'm definitely going to steal that. Sort of like the
"refudiation" of crowdsourcing.
Systematically-manipulated (or systematically "refudiated") public opinion
polls can also be (and often are) used for crowdstamping, by the way. It's
not just a feature of open-comment processes, but can be applied as a
variant where public opinion is manufactured artificially. This is a
technique that goes all the way back to high school.
"Everyone" says so! The People have spoken! :-)
Thanks,
Dan
--
Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author alone and do
not necessarily reflect any position of the author's employer.
At 11:53 AM +0800 8/4/10, David Cake wrote:
> A useful neologism for ICANN processes (via Lillian Edwards
>twitter feed)
>Crowdstamping - going through the motions in asking the public about
>a policy but rubberstamping it anyway.
> (term apparently coined by Uk web developer Stef Lewandowski
>in reponse to UK government consultation that, in response to 9,500
>public submissions,resulted in every responding government dept
>uniformly saying they should keep doing exactly what they were doing)
> Regards
> David
|
|
|