NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Andrew A. Adams" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Andrew A. Adams
Date:
Wed, 2 Jun 2010 16:28:56 +0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
An interesting briefing paper about short trade marks, in general and in 
domain names, appeared in my inbox today. As there is some issue of the 
minimum length for domain names in generic TLDs (particularly in ideographic 
character sets under IDN) I thought it would be of interest to those here.

http://tinyurl.com/2fxyvbs

Also, the proposal by Nominet to auction short domain names in .co.uk to 
current competing registered trade mark holders, then open it to unregistered 
mark holders, then auction the rest. Would such an approach be legitimate for 
a general approach by a new TLD operator, or must they always operate on a 
single-price first-come/first-served basis albeit possibly with sunrise 
periods? If so we seem to be backsliding into the bad old days of NSI and 
potentially a license to print money again if ICANN allocates a new gTLD 
(effectively creating scarce real estate ex nihilo) and allows such an 
auction during a sunrise period.


-- 
Professor Andrew A Adams       [log in to unmask]
Professor at Graduate School of Business Administration, and
Deputy Director of the Centre for Business Information Ethics
Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2