Hello Jorge,

A brief comment... there was a proposition floated suggesting that
"Public Interest" (very limited?) redefinition to mean that "just
ensure the DNS system works - stability, resiliency.."

I found it limiting given that the Internet ought to fundamentally
enable a better realisation of The Universal Declaration of Human
Rights - http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/ - obviously while the
DNS works in a stable and resilient manner. Otherwise, expect
problems..

regards,

Alex

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> In his opening speech here at the Icann Brussels meeting, Beckstrom stresses
>> that the central role of Icann is the security and stability "of the
>> Internet". Wow, I thought that it was just the name/addressing system.
>>
>> Megalomanous discourse summarizes his speech...
>
> It is very concerning that many involved in management an governance
> of ICANN still don't have a clear understanding about what ICANN role
> and mandate is or worse they are trying to steer its role influenced
> by special interests.
>
> It seems that Rod wants to have the DNSCERT under his umbrella when it
> is clearly out of the scope of ICANN and there is not much support and
> agreement about the need and how to implement a DNSCERT.
>
> Another issue to think about is to see if at some time will be
> possible to disengage IANA from ICANN and assign the IANA role to
> non-US centric and not ICANN controlled/staffed international
> organization.
>
> BTW, for those that had a chance to participate at the ATRT meetings,
> what is the overall perception about the constituency of that group ?
>
> Have fun over there, don't have much time to participate this time but
> I'm keeping an eye on some issues.
>
> Regards
> Jorge
>