Dear Carlos,

Very true that is one way, it we demand enough, we will get some transparency.  

But transparency to the elected should not depend on the people demanding, it should be an aspect of the system and a trait of the leadership.  Also issues need to be brought to the group as a whole for the group as a whole to be active.

br,

avri

On 21 Nov 2011, at 09:03, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:

> Dear Avri, if so, wouldn't more transparency on the part of the chair be
> primarily a result of the consituency's proactive involvement in the
> NCUC governance process?
> 
> In other words, we members can and should help the chair (and the EC) to
> improve on this whenever the constituency detects a problem.
> 
> frt rgds
> 
> --c.a.
> 
> On 11/21/2011 11:34 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>> If Konstantinos accepts this nomination, I hope he is willing and able to explain how he will make NCUC more transparent and accountable over his next term. I think that as an advocate for NCUC principles, especially with regard to the UDRP and other TM related issues, he is an excellent advocate.  But I do not feel his last year as chair has been at all transparent.
>> 
>> avri
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 19 Nov 2011, at 14:11, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
>> 
>>> OOOOPPPPSSS, sorry, the phrase was wrong, of course (thanks, Nuno!).
>>> 
>>> I wish to nominate Konstantinos Komaitis for a second term as NCUC chair.
>>> 
>>> fraternal regards
>>> 
>>> --c.a.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 11/18/2011 02:47 PM, Nuno Garcia wrote:
>>>> Carlos, ha aqui um erro, parece-me. falta ali um "not" em "why we
>>>> should not nominate".
>>>> 
>>>> Abraço fraterno,
>>>> Nuno
>>>> 
>>>> On 18 November 2011 16:35, Carlos A. Afonso <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>> Ddear people, I see no relevant reason why we should nominate
>>>>> Konstantinos Komaitis for a second term, so I am doing this right now.
>>>>> 
>>>>> fraternal regards
>>>>> 
>>>>> --c.a.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>