NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-NCUC <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Date:
Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:17:28 -0400
Reply-To:
Subject:
From:
Debra Hughes <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (122 lines)
All,
Unfortunately, I cannot participate since I have a meeting at this time.

Debbie


-----Original Message-----
From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Avri Doria
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 7:30 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Open Policy discussion Meeting - 9 June 2010

Hi,

We will be holding our final pre-Brussels phone call on Wednesday 9 June
at 21 UTC <http://ncdnhc.org/events/ncsg-policy-meeting-9-june>  .

The draft Agenda:

A.  Followup on actions from previous meeting

---

B. Issues for GNSO meeting.

https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?proposed_agenda_10_june_2010

Item 2: Prioritization of GNSO work 

Item 3: GNSO AoC DT Endorsement Process


Item 4: Implementation of New gTLD Recommendation 2 

Item 5: AGP Policy questions 

5.4 Discussion of questions raised by Craig Schwartz in the 21 April
Council meeting (continued from 20 May)

* Should the Council consider modifying the AGP Limits Policy to no
longer require semi-annual updates?
* Should the Council consider modifying the AGP Limits Policy by
defining the terms "extraordinary circumstances" or "reoccur regularly?
For example:

o Should instances of consumer fraud automatically be a legitimate use
of AGP deletes?
o If a registrar proactively takes down (i.e., deletes) domains that are
known to propagate a fraudulent activity such as phishing, should the
registrar bear the cost if the deletions cause the registrar to exceed
the threshold defined in the Policy?

Item 6: Whois Studies 

6.1 Refer to:

* Whois Studies Report:
http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/whois-studies-report-for-gnso-23mar10
-en.pdf

* RFP for Proxy/Abuse Study:
http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-18may10-en.htm

* ICANN's FY11 Draft Operating Plan and Budget:

http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#op-budget-fy2011 (Note: Public
comment period is open until 25 June; the amount in the Draft Budget for
Whois Studies is at least $ 400,000.)

6.2 Procedure for deciding which study(studies) to initiate

* Brief overview of the study choices (Liz Gasster)


Item 7: GNSO Improvements OSC Recommendations from the CCT 

http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cct-consolidated-report-final-09apr10-en.pd
f

* Public comments:

http://forum.icann.org/lists/cct-recommendations/

* Public comment summary & analysis:

http://forum.icann.org/lists/cct-recommendations/msg00004.html

Item 8: Other Business 

Note: I would like to ask the meeting whether there is support for
asking our NCSG council members to request that all GNSO council
telephone meetings be audiocast

---

C. Update on WG/Wt efforts

I ask that any NCSG members participating in WG/WT be ready to give an
update on what is going on in those groups

Note; I have started a wiki page of WG/WT activities.  This is very
incomplete - in fact it is mostly empty.  I also include the names of
people involved in the various efforts that is also very incomplete.
Please let me know of any edits I should make.

https://st.icann.org/ncsg-ec/index.cgi?ncsg_policy_issues

---

D. NCSG updates

- election
- wiki
- 

---

E. Planning for Brussles

F.  Other

ATOM RSS1 RSS2