Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:37:20 +0900 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>Adam Peake wrote:
>
>>There will be another workshop in Whois at Carthage and I think
>>that's the most important issue on ICANN's agenda at the moment.
>>Perhaps a good idea to support a second Whois/privacy expert
>>(Stephanie Perrin, if she's able to attend, or is not anyway
>>attending on EPIC's behalf, or Alan Davidson, CDT) or someone from
>>Europe who could provide comment on issues beyond the US/N. American
>>view.
>
>Adam, I am quite surprised by your "racist" comment.
>You sound only US/N or Europe can have some views on Whois.
e.g. <http://lyris.tucows.com:8080/read/messages?id=180863>
European experience seems it may be helpful in some ways to our
arguments (I am *not* suggesting NCUC/EPIC would pay for Moers.)
>Definitely many other parts of the world do care the issue. As we saw AUDA,
>whether we believe or not it is Asia Pacific region instead of
>Europe or NA, they do
>care.
Irony?
Thanks,
Adam
>And recently, according to Sept. 22 news, KISA(Korea Information Secuirty
>Agency) also announced some recommendations on Whois. You can see from the
>following url.
>
>http://security.inews24.com/php/news_view.php?g_menu=080200&g_serial=99203
>(in Korean)
>
>It emphasizes domain registrars should give the registrants options not to
>disclose their whois. When the registrars disclose the whois after agreement
>from the registrant, it should be notified to the registrants in advance.
>
>>No detailed agenda from ICANN. Hard to know what additional
>>expertise might be required. This has always been a problem of
>>trying to target funds for attendance at ICANN meetings.
>
>One of agenda many of you don't care as native speakers of English could be
>IDN(Multilingual Domain Issues). The issue has been silently discussed and
>presented as a conclusion. It is another frustration to those who are going to
>be affected by the decision as users.
>
>Hope you can explain what you said.
>YJ
--
|
|
|