That's great Wendy. As a beneficiary of the Fellowship Program myself, I
would like to volunteer to follow up with Fellows who are engaged at
meetings whether I attend them myself or not. ICANN meetings and discussions
are intimidating (to say the least) for newbies. Follow up with them is
definitely desirable and important. That is precisely the reason why I am in
favour of exploring the proposal submitted by Marilyn.

Thanks.

Amr

-----Original Message-----
From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wendy
Seltzer
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 2:05 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Initial Draft Proposal regarding standard
Project Funding to Constituencies/SGs

On 11/16/2011 01:16 AM, Adam Peake wrote:
> It's a good programme, do NCSG members meet with the Fellows?

I have attended Fellowship morning meetings at the past two ICANNs (at
Avri's recommendation in Singapore), and found them to be a good chance
to describe NCSG to the group and invite their participation.  This
time, I attended on Monday and was pleased to see many Fellows
participating in our Tuesday meetings.

Speaking of which, have we followed up with participants who attended
the meeting to invite them to consider SG membership?

--Wendy

-- 
Wendy Seltzer -- [log in to unmask] +1 914-374-0613
Fellow, Yale Law School Information Society Project
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
http://wendy.seltzer.org/
https://www.chillingeffects.org/
https://www.torproject.org/
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/