NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 9 Jun 2012 15:09:46 +0200
Reply-To:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (71 lines)
I am always game to ask GAC members about the undoubtedly open transparent multistakeholder domestic processes through which they arrive at their positions…

BD

On Jun 9, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Adam Peake wrote:

> Might expand 2 with a reference to GAC early warning system, ask if
> Governments can introduce how they are reaching out to their domestic
> stakeholders (and who they consider those stakeholders to be:
> national agencies, states/provinces/prefecture (region), other
> multi-stakeholders), what criteria they are looking at to define
> "Warning"  (i.e. what's the alert to them.)
> 
> Adam
> 
> 
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:37 PM, William Drake <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi
>> 
>> Just wondering if people have any views/input on the proposed agenda below.
>>  Do we feel ready to offer views at this stage on the second point?  Would
>> we want to suggest any broadening of the fourth?  Anything else?
>> 
>> Bill
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>> From: Glen de Saint Géry <[log in to unmask]>
>> Date: June 8, 2012 4:18:14 PM GMT+02:00
>> To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: [council] TR: GNSO/GAC Session
>> 
>> Dear All,
>> 
>> Please find below the proposed agenda items for the Joint session in Prague.
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> Kind regards
>> De : GAC Secretariat [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> Envoyé : vendredi 8 juin 2012 02:11
>> À : Glen de Saint Géry
>> Cc : Neuman, Jeff; [log in to unmask]
>> Objet : GNSO/GAC Session
>> 
>> Dear Glen,
>> 
>> The GAC would like to propose the following agenda items for the joint
>> session in Prague, currently scheduled for Sunday 24 June at 16.30-18.00.
>> 
>> 
>> Update on GNSO new PDP
>> Expected impact of new gTLD program on GNSO constituencies
>> Update on GNSO Council's Consumer Trust, Choice and Competition Working
>> Group
>> IOC/Red Cross – Next steps after board rejection of recommendations.
>> 
>> Please let me know if there is anything else to be added to this agenda.
>> Also, if you could be so kind as to point me in the direction of any
>> briefing materials the GNSO may have on these topics so I can prepare the
>> GAC I would be grateful. I don't need the documents compiled just perhaps a
>> place to start! Also, if there are any other materials you would like the
>> GAC to have in advance, please do not hesitate to send them to me and I will
>> circulate to the list. Thank you.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Jeannie Ellers
>> 
>> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2