[log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 26 Aug 2009 20:00:36 -0400738_us-ascii Here is a revised statement.
Noncommercial Users Constituency statement on vertical separation of registries and registrars
version 1.1, 26 August 2009
Opening observations.
Registry-registrar separation was a regulatory response to the dominance of the entire gTLD market by one vertically integrated provider (Network Solutions, Inc., now Vo, as a WG participant on behalf of NCUC, I also agree with the comments
below. Once I realized what had transpired in sub-group A, where the
reveal function was defined, I (and others) tried to object to it all
along, as it seems like a total loophole to the access provisions we were
trying to define and balance in sub-group B. (Agreement levels surrounding
access types were also distorted in the final [...]42_16Sep200721:39:
[log in to unmask]
0709 8169 97 32_Re: Urgent: your response needed13_Norbert
[log in to unmask], 17 Sep 2007 11:39:08 +07000_37_17Sep200711:39:
[log in to unmask]
0709 8267 76 32_Re: Urgent: your response needed13_Norbert
[log in to unmask], 17 Sep 2007 12:00:06 +0700407_ISO-8859-1 Dear Kathy,
thanks for your detailed support.
Dear Executive Committee and GNSO Council colleagues,
I welcome the offer of Kathy to help in establishing contact / working
with national or international data protection commissions (plural, if
possible including, but not only Canada) - as soon as possible - asking
for a competent review of the WHOIS proposals. [...]37_17Sep200712:00:
[log in to unmask]
0709 8344 91 32_Re: Urgent: your response needed11_Robin
[log in to unmask], 17 Sep 2007 01:56:39 -0700710_us-ascii I am also grateful for Kathy's analysis of this report and excellent
suggestion to engage data protection officials.
We are lucky to have Kathy's expertise on this issue and agree with
Norbert that we should take her up on the offer for assistance.
Thanks,
Robin
Norbert Klein wrote:
>Dear Kathy,
>
>thanks for your detailed support.
>
>
>Dear Executive Committee and GNSO Council colleagues,
>
>I welcome the offer of Kathy to help in establishing contact / working
>with national or international data protection commissions (plural, if
>possible including, but not only Canada) - as soon as possible - [...]41_17Sep200701:56:
[log in to unmask]
0709 8436 42 32_Re: Urgent: your response needed10_Adam
[log in to unmask], 17 Sep 2007 18:22:32 +0900651_us-ascii At 2:07 PM -0400 9/16/07, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>I am asking ALL NCUC members to express their opinion on this by
>replying to this email. Just check one of the two boxes. Add
>comments if you have any.
>
>NCUC should respond to the Draft Staff Report on Whois by expressing
>its support for Motion #3 contained in the report. That motion
>declares that there is no consensus on existing Whois policy and
>asks that the Whois portions of the Registrar Accreditation
>Agreement be "sunsetted" (i.e., expired) at the end of 2008. This
>motion should NOT be withdrawn if [...]38_17Sep200718:22:
[log in to unmask]
0709 8479 342 32_Re: Urgent: your response needed17_Dave
[log in to unmask], 17 Sep 2007 13:29:13 +0400562_US-ASCII /__X_/ AGREE
Dave Kissoondoyal
President, ISOC Mauritius
PIR .ORG AC Member
_____
From: Non-Commercial User Constituency
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Norbert Klein
Sent: 17 September 2007 08:39
To:
[log in to unmask]Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Urgent: your response needed
Milton L Mueller wrote:
I am asking ALL NCUC members to express their opinion on this by replying to
this email. Just check one of the two boxes. Add comments if yo
