NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 22 Apr 2012 11:14:19 +0800
Reply-To:
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
From:
"Horacio T. Cadiz" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
> As a prospective gTLD applicant, who's gone through 3yrs of funding
> rounds.. and been through the entire application process requirements
> without submitting the final application.
>
> All I can say is this glitch could have as a brief summary:
>
> 1. Compromised stages of funding for 3 yrs.  <£5m
> 2. Put my head on the line
> 3. If any IP on policy, even documents that had been withdrawn was
> disclosed including any user information. This could have compromised:
> a. Our entire business model
> b. Partnership association
> c. Trust in the ICANN process to ensure confidentiality and meet their
> commitments as stated in the guidebook

  In your model, did you make provisions for litigation? I can imagine
that at least one deep-pocketed losing applicant going through that
route.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2