On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:57 AM, David Cake <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>        Just to address Alains comments about our 'dirty laundry' - I agree with the general NCUC feeling that a separate NCUC list for policy discussion would probably be a mistake, I think an NCUC list for NCUC internal procedural issues would be the optimum - but I'm loathe to create a separate email list for what is usually a very small number of messages, especially given the confusion that might result between the two (as soon as two separate lists existed, I would foresee a regular quantity of messages to the wrong list).

Or messages being sent to both lists anyway, for fear that someone
will miss one.  I agree creating another list would create little
benefit, and potentially cause a lot of confusion.
As suggested by Avri, tagging those rare "NCUC only" messages as such
seems to me to cause the least amount of pain.


---------------------------------------
Brenden Kuerbis
Internet Governance Project
http://internetgovernance.org


 Suggestions for how better to manage the issue welcome.
>        Regards
>                David
>
>