Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) |
Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:36:38 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
hi,
i can add something on the weighted voting.
and i will search for the typos.
thanks for your edits.
a.
On 14 Jun 2010, at 22:33, Mary Wong wrote:
> Thanks for taking the lead and all the drafting on this (and so many other things), Avri - and thank you for taking my comments on board too :)
>
> There are a couple of typos (some of which may have been my fault during my energetic red-lining earlier), but I also had a question - we say that we couldn't reach 2 members and so asked Olga to step in as a trusted third party intermediary, but then she receives 6 votes - is there something we need to add to explain those numbers?
>
> Thanks,
> Mary
>
> Mary W S Wong
> Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> Franklin Pierce Law Center
> Two White Street
> Concord, NH 03301
> USA
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>
>
> >>>
> From: Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 6/14/2010 10:13 PM
> Subject: Vote, Cover Letter and Charter
> Hi,
>
> As as been announced the Charter was accepted.
>
> Details on the vote can be found at: https://st.icann.org/ncsg-ec/index.cgi?non_commercial_stakeholder_group
>
> Of 199 possible voters, 142 members voted that 71.3%.
> Of 314 possible votes, 231 votes were cast that is 73.6%
>
> of which 221 votes were in favor of the charter
> and 10 were against the charter.
>
> These means that 70.38% of the members vote were in favor of the charter, which is greater then the 60% threshold defined for success.
>
> My thanks to ALL who voted. And my special thanks to all who made the vote successful.
>
> I have appended a draft of the cover letter I plan to send to the Board tomorrow. This letter has been reviewed in the NCSG Executive and the NCSG Policy committee. I know this is a quick rush for review, but I really do need to get the material submitted before Brussels and this has been a very long haul. If anyone does have time and does comment, I would appreciate it. I am sure there are some typos or worse.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> a.
>
>
>
>
> <IMAGE.jpg>
|
|
|