On 11/06/2011 05:38 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
> On 7 Nov 2011, at 00:11, David Cake wrote:
>
>> What are being suggested now are more like informal working groups.
That's what I'm hearing and suggesting.
> Though I thought we were putting a lot of pressure on having
> substantive conversations on the Discuss list. Now we are talking
> about needing to remove discussions from the discuss list to protect
> the non-intersted. Sort of confusing.
As I see it, we need a way to identify people interested in and willing
to take responsibility for particular issue areas; and a place for them
to discuss those issues. I'd be happy to see us use the ncsg-discuss
list for discussion (perhaps with a subject-matter tag), and the ning
site or a wiki to keep track of member interest and identify discussion
leaders. How's that for lightweight and yet effective?
--Wendy
--
Wendy Seltzer -- [log in to unmask] +1 914-374-0613
Fellow, Yale Law School Information Society Project
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
http://wendy.seltzer.org/https://www.chillingeffects.org/https://www.torproject.org/http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/