Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 21 Jan 2014 13:48:24 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi,
Thank you Kathy.
We need more writers like you submitting position papers for the NCSG
and its constituencies to consider.
Sometimes we succeed in getting teams to write something for the NCSG
Discuss list and the Policy Committee to consider, and a few people are
trying to figure out how better to enable such efforts. In the meantime,
the way we mostly get statements is for some inspired NCSG member to
write one and the rest of us to discuss and to wordsmith.
So anytime any of you gets the urge to write either about a WG they are
participating in when they have a comments call or any of the open
community calls - they should write something and submit to the discuss
list. Then either me or whoever is next elected to lead the Policy
Committee next, will make sure they put into a process to get it
submitted. And of course you can always submit your own comments as an
individual or organization.
Note, the earlier something is submitted the better chance it has of
being processed properly.
There are always open comment periods.
They can alwasy be found at: www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment
avri
PS. Since there are new members, and I have done very little lately to
welcome new members and invite them into policy process: an info-note I
wrote last year on how to get involved can be found at:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Guide+to+getting+started+in+NCSG
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Getting+Involved+in+Working+Groups
Like most things on our wiki they need updating, but i just re-read them
and they seem passable. (-: Can't be much better that that since no one
has ever liked them)
Apologies for sending this note under the other topic Study .... I am
never sure that many people read the email with an administrivia subject
lines. If you got far enough to read that line, you are someone who
might have read it anyway.
cheers.
On 21-Jan-14 12:29, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
> Great and thank you, All!
> Kathy
>
> :
>> The NCSG Policy Committee has reviewed the statements made by the NCUC
>> and by ALAC.
>>
>> NCSG endorses the NCUC statement which in turn endorses the ALAC
>> Statement. Specifically:
>>
>> NCUC Statement:
>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-whois-misuse-27nov13/msg00012.html
>>
>> ALAC Statement:
>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-whois-misuse-27nov13/msg00004.html
>>
>> Thank you and apologies for the tardiness.
>>
>> Avri Doria
>> Alternate Chair, NCSG Policy Committee
>
>
|
|
|