NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:06:17 -0500
Reply-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (5 lines)
We started review of IRTP-C comments today - they are recapped in <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtppdpwg/Next+Meeting>. At next week's meeting we will be continuing discussion and I have recommended (as co-chair of the WG) that we go back to our respective groups and see if any of the groups who did not comment yet on the Issues Report wish to. Or whether they are interested in making second order comments based on the replies received so far.

avri

PS: I think it would be good if those of us who participate in WGs were to do something like this on a regular basis.  I will try to do so in the groups I participate in.  Perhaps we could even use these to populate the Policy pages of the WIKI.  Just a thought.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2