NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:14:24 -0500
Reply-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: new-gtld-committee-not-sure-how-to-handle-closed-generic-applications
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
That is what I beleive.

avri

On 6 Feb 2013, at 14:43, Milton L Mueller wrote:

> A quote from Karen Lentz (ICANN legal staff): "Under the current rules, there's nothing that would prevent the use of closed generics, which is focused on the issue of who can register a name."
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
>> Of William Drake
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 1:18 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] new-gtld-committee-not-sure-how-to-handle-
>> closed-generic-applications
>> 
>> surprise!
>> 
>> http://www.thedomains.com/2013/02/05/icann-new-gtld-committee-not-
>> sure-how-to-handle-closed-generic-applications/
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2