Hi,
Reminder, it is only 90 minutes until the meeting.
I am hoping enough of the elected g-council members will be able to attend in order to have a full conversation onf the issue before the g-council.
thanks
avri
On 12 Feb 2013, at 04:07, Robin Gross wrote:
> Reminder: today is NCSG's monthly policy meeting and all NCSG members are welcome to join the call. Details below.
>
> Avri Doria has graciously agreed to step in and chair the discusion since I will be going through security at the airport at the time of the meeting and so my connection will not be stable enough to chair the discussion. But I will be able to join for part of the mtg.
>
> I hope you all will join the call!
>
> Thanks,
> Robin
>
>
>>
>> 2013/2/10, Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]>:
>>
>> Reminder: I hope you all will join in Tuesday's NCSG Open Policy
>>
>> Meeting, which is an open discussion between the NCSG Policy
>>
>> Committee, including the NCSG GNSO Councilors and the entire NCSG
>>
>> membership. The meeting is held 12 Feb., which is 2 days before the
>>
>> next GNSO Council meeting to help prepare for NCSG's participation in
>>
>> that meeting. Dial-in and remote participation details are below.
>>
>> Also below is a revised discussion agenda. If anyone needs a dial-
>>
>> out, please let me know at least 24-hours before the meeting to
>>
>> ensure we have enough time to make the dial-out happen.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please join in the discussion. Thank you!
>>
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Robin
>>
>>
>>
>> NCSG Policy Open Meeting
>>
>> 12 February 2013
>>
>> 21:00 - 23:00 UTC
>>
>>
>>
>> Other Time Zones:
>>
>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=NCSG+Open
>>
>> +Policy+Meeting+February+2013&iso=20130212T21&p1=1440&ah=2
>>
>>
>>
>> Remote Participation Details:
>>
>> Telephone: http://ipjustice.org/ICANN/NCSG/NCSG_Passcodes.htm
>>
>> Adobe Connect: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/_a819976787/ncsg/
>>
>>
>>
>> Discussion Agenda:
>>
>>
>>
>> I. Discussion of Intercessional Meeting in LA
>>
>> a) Update from participants
>>
>> b) Next Steps / Follow Ups:
>>
>> i) Possible letter to ICANN requesting input in org's engagement
>>
>> plans
>>
>> ii) Policy "cheat sheets" - 1-page summary of policy issues
>>
>> requested by CEO
>>
>>
>>
>> II. Preparation for GNSO Council Meeting of 14 February 2013
>>
>> Council Agenda & Motions:
>>
>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/GNSO+Council
>>
>> +Meeting+2013-02-14
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. Strawman Model, Trademark Clearinghouse & Blocking (aka
>>
>> "defensive registrations")
>>
>> NCSG Statement : http://forum.icann.org/lists/tmch-strawman/
>>
>> msg00029.html
>>
>>
>>
>> a) Discussion item for GNSO Council:
>>
>> "ICANN’s CEO has requested GNSO Council input on the Strawman
>>
>> Proposal developed through the TMCH related implementation
>>
>> discussions, which has been posted for public comment. http://
>>
>> www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-30nov12-en.htm.
>>
>> ICANN’s CEO additionally requested Council input on the joint
>>
>> proposal from the Business Constituency/Intellectual Property
>>
>> Constituency (BC/IPC) for a “limited preventative registration
>>
>> mechanism” which is also currently available for public comment. A
>>
>> subsequent note (19 December 2012) from ICANN’s CEO clarified the
>>
>> desired deadline for input to be no later than 22 February 2013.
>>
>>
>>
>> Related to this discussion is the Staff briefing paper (http://
>>
>> gnso.icann.org/en/node/32287) to the GNSO Council on the topic of
>>
>> defensive registrations at the second level, in response to a
>>
>> previous request from the New GLTD Committee (2012.04.10.NG2). The
>>
>> New GTLD Committee requested the GNSO to consider whether additional
>>
>> work on defensive registrations at the second level should be
>>
>> undertaken.
>>
>>
>>
>> The Council is to continue to discuss: (i) a response to the ICANN
>>
>> CEOs request, and (ii) to consider whether to undertake any
>>
>> additional work related to the BC/IPC proposal and/or the Staff
>>
>> briefing paper, on the topic of second level defensive registrations."
>>
>>
>>
>> b) Public Comments:
>>
>> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/tmch-
>>
>> strawman-30nov12-en.htm
>>
>> 5 or 22 Feb?
>>
>>
>>
>> 2. Special Privileges for RedCross, Olympic Cmtes, IGO's?
>>
>>
>>
>> a) IGO-INGO Working Group - purpose - status
>>
>> NCSG Input Statement to Working Group
>>
>>
>>
>> b) Discussion item for GNSO Council Mtg:
>>
>> "At its 26 November 2012 meeting, the Board requested that the GNSO
>>
>> continue its work on policy recommendations on top and second-level
>>
>> protections for certain IGO and INGO names on an expedited basis.
>>
>>
>>
>> In addition, the Board requested that the GNSO Council advise the
>>
>> Board by no later than 28 February 2013 if it is aware of any concern
>>
>> such as with the global public interest or the security or stability
>>
>> of the DNS, that the Board should take into account in making its
>>
>> decision about whether to include second level protections for
>>
>> certain IGO names and acronyms by inclusion on a Reserved Names List
>>
>> in section 2.2.1.2.3 of the Applicant Guidebook, applicable in all
>>
>> new gTLD registries approved in the first round of the New gTLD
>>
>> Program. The specific IGO names to be protected shall be those names
>>
>> or acronyms that: 1) qualify under the current existing criteria to
>>
>> register a domain name in the .int gTLD; and 2) have a
>>
>> registered .int domain OR a determination of eligibility under
>>
>> the .int criteria; and 3) apply to ICANN to be listed on the reserved
>>
>> names list for the second level prior to the delegation of any new
>>
>> gTLDs by no later than 28 February 2013."
>>
>>
>>
>> 3. So-called "Closed Generic" TLDs
>>
>>
>>
>> a) Discussion item for GNSO Council Mtg:
>>
>> The New gTLD Program Committee recently directed the ICANN CEO to
>>
>> request the GNSO to provide guidance on the issue of "closed generic"
>>
>> TLDs, , concurrent with the opening of the public comment forum and
>>
>> if the GNSO wishes, to provide such guidance. Guidance on this issue
>>
>> is requested to be provided by the close of the public comment forum.
>>
>> (7 March)
>>
>>
>>
>> b) Open Comment Period
>>
>> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/closed-generic-05feb13-
>>
>> en.htm
>>
>> Comment Close: 7 March 2013
>>
>>
>>
>> 4. Policy vs Implementation
>>
>>
>>
>> a) Discussion item for GNSO Council Mtg:
>>
>> "The recent letter from the GAC as well as activities relating to
>>
>> work on the Trademark Clearinghouse, highlights a broader issue
>>
>> regarding the boundary between policy development and implementation
>>
>> work as well as the effective integration of policy development and
>>
>> integration work from the outset.
>>
>>
>>
>> Recent discussions on the Council mailing list indicate that there is
>>
>> an interest to undertake further work on this issue. At the same
>>
>> time, ICANN Staff has published a paper that is intended to
>>
>> facilitate further community discussions on this topic."
>>
>>
>>
>> b) Open Comment Period:
>>
>> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/policy-
>>
>> implementation-31jan13-en.htm
>>
>> Comment Close: 21 Feb. 2013
>>
>> Reply Comment Close: 14 March 2013
>>
>> ICANN staff paper - draft framework for discussion:
>>
>> http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/policy-implementation-
>>
>> framework-08jan13-en.pdf
>>
>>
>>
>> 5. WHOIS Privacy and Proxy Relay and Reveal Study
>>
>>
>>
>> a) Discussion item for GNSO Council Mtg:
>>
>> "At the ICANN Meeting in Toronto, Lyman Chapin presented the results
>>
>> of the survey that evaluated the feasibility of conducting a future
>>
>> in-depth study into communication Relay and identity Reveal requests
>>
>> sent for gTLD domain names registered using Proxy and Privacy
>>
>> services. The Council should consider whether to go ahead with the
>>
>> study."
>>
>> NCSG response?
>>
>>
>>
>> 6. All proxies requested found for Thursday's G-Council Mtg?
>>
>> a) Maria Farrell will serve as Magaly Pazello's proxy. (done)
>>
>> b) Who will serve as Wolfgang's proxy?
>>
>> c) All other GNSO Councilors will participate?
>>
>>
>>
>> III. Prep for Beijing ICANN Meeting #46
>>
>> Start to Consider: What policy issues do we want to discuss with: (a)
>>
>> ICANN Board, (b) At-Large, and 2-3 topics to propose for (c) Public
>>
>> Forum?
>>
>>
>>
>> IV. AOB?
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> RELATED:
>>
>>
>>
>> GNSO Council meeting audio cast:
>>
>> http://stream.icann.org:8000/gnso.m3u
>>
>>
>>
>> Agenda of 14 February GNSO Council Mtg:
>>
>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Agenda+-+14
>>
>> +February+2013
>>
>>
>>
>> Attendance Record of NCSG Policy & Executive Committee Members at
>>
>> NCSG Policy Meetings:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?
>>
>> key=0AmHFgvYjF_e4dGdNcVVfdHI2SWJ4dDZjU2xYaGV0WUE
>>
>>
>>
>> Open ICANN Public Comments Periods
>>
>> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> IP JUSTICE
>>
>> Robin Gross, Executive Director
>>
>> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
>>
>> p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451
>>
>> w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: [log in to unmask]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
|
