NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:46:57 +0800
Reply-To:
[log in to unmask]
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Subject:
Revised New gTLD Registry Agreement Including Additional Public Interest Commitments Specification
From:
"Horacio T. Cadiz" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Organization:
Philippine Network Foundation, Inc (PHNET)
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines) 
On 02/07/2013 06:24 AM, Robin Gross wrote:
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Glen de Saint Géry <[log in to unmask]>
>> Date: February 6, 2013 2:17:59 PM PST
>> To: liaison6c <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: [liaison6c] Revised New gTLD Registry Agreement Including Additional
>> Public Interest Commitments Specification
>>
>>
>> Revised New gTLD Registry Agreement Including Additional Public Interest
>> Commitments Specification


>> The Public Interest Commitments Specification will require operators of new
>> gTLDs to use only registrars that are party to the 2013 Registrar
>> Accreditation Agreement (which is under negotiation).

    How would this work for closed dot-brand gTLDs? I'm sure that the
brand-owners have sought exemptions from using registrars for their
brand names.




-- 
Bombim Cadiz
*****************************************
*  Free/Open Source Software (FOSS) --  *
* No windows. No gates. It is open.     *
* No Bill. It is Free.                  *
*****************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2