NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Rudi Vansnick <[log in to unmask]>, marie-laure Lemineur <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:17:29 -0800
Reply-To:
Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]>
X-cc:
NCSG-Policy Policy <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5C74C505-A82C-436F-ACB9-CC489B52D602"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (976 bytes) , signature.asc (505 bytes)
Hi there,

Rudi Vasnick and Marie-laure are the two NPOC members of the NCSG Policy Committee.  

Rudi, Marie-laure: do either of you have a view on this statement?

Thanks!
Robin


On Nov 13, 2013, at 1:01 PM, Kathy Kleiman wrote:

> We resolved Milton's issues last night. Amr and I worked with him on the edits, and incorporated every one he wanted. He's en route today to BA.
> 
> Avri, could you perhaps reach out to the Policy Committee people in each constituency for their support?
> 
> Best,
> Kathy
>> On 13 Nov 2013, at 15:09, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
>> 
>>> Avri, what would like as the process to finalize?  Are we OK to submit since these have been in circulation awhile and up for discussion and review?
>> 
>> Well Milton had a few issues and I was hoping that he would indicate whether his issue had been resolved.
>> 
>> Also, for the Policy committee to submit something, normally want hear at least one voice from each constituency if possible.
>> 
>> avri
>> 
> 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2