NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Olévié Kouami <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Olévié Kouami <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Aug 2014 18:51:54 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (80 lines)
+1
Thank you Avri.
-Olévié-


2014-08-06 17:19 UTC, Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]>:
> Thanks for this, Avri. I have also been failing to attend and contribute to
> this WG over the past couple of months. I plan on re-engaging, and the links
> you sent are a great way to get up-to-speed on the discussions that have
> been taking place.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Amr
>
> On Aug 6, 2014, at 6:42 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> After a few weeks of missing the meetings, I am trying to catch up.
>> Figured it was a good opportunity to give NCSG an update.
>>
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/PIWG/Attendance+log+-+Policy+and+Implementation+Working+Group>
>>
>> NCSG is only at 30% attendance, then again no one except ALAC has done
>> better than 50% attendance.  I have got to try harder.
>>
>> --- Docs:
>>
>> <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/48348715/Deliverable%20I%20-%20PIWG%20-%20updated%2024%20July%202014.doc?api=v2>
>>
>> This documents is pretty good at giving an idea of where the thinking is
>> at.
>>
>> <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpageattachments.action?pageId=48348715&highlight=GNSO+Processes+-+16+July+2014.pdf#Next+Meeting-attachment-GNSO+Processes+-+16+July+2014.pdf>
>>
>> Is also interesting.
>>
>> <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/41899490/PI%20Proposed%20Working%20Definitions%20-%20FINAL%20as%20of%202%20April%202014.doc?version=1&modificationDate=1397164979000&api=v2>
>>
>> Defines the terms as the group is attempting to use them
>>
>> --- Among the issues:
>>
>> In addition the PDP (policy development process), and the IRT
>> (Implementation Review Teams), the group is looking at recommending the
>> creation a:
>>
>> - Policy Input Process (PIP)
>> The Policy Input Process is modelled on the approach that has been used
>> for various efforts such as input to the ATRT2 and Board request for
>> input on the Whois Review Team recommendations. This process is intended
>> to be lightweight to allow the Council to respond in a timely manner,
>> noting that the outcome has no binding force
>>
>> - Policy Guidance Process - A fast Track PDP
>>
>> - discussing the appropriate board response to the various mechanisms.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> It is always helpful to have comments from NCSG members who have the
>> time and inclination to do so.  Enriches the contributions to the WG.
>>
>> avri
>


-- 
Olévié Ayaovi Agbenyo KOUAMI
Responsable Département CERGI-Education (http://www.cergibs.com)
CEO de INTIC4DEV (http://www.intic4dev.org)
SG de ESTETIC  (http://www.estetic.tg)
Membre de ISoc (www.isoc.org <http://www.isoc.org/>) & du FOSSFA (
www.fossfa.net)
ICANN-NPOC Communications Committee Chair (http://www.icann.org/ et
http://www.npoc.org/)
BP : 851 - Tél.: (228) 90 98 86 50 / (228) 98 43 27 72
Skype : olevie1 FB : @olivier.kouami.3 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé - Togo

ATOM RSS1 RSS2