Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 21 Oct 2016 10:31:00 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> On Oct 21, 2016, at 10:27, David Cake <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> On 20 Oct 2016, at 1:06 AM, Ayden Férdeline <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I agree with Bill that we should try to blend questions 1 and 3 together. I would also like to know how the Board envisions the new gTLD contention set auction proceeds being spent... There's now US$240 million "reserved and earmarked until the Board determines a plan for the appropriate use of the funds through consultation with the community". So what's the plan, I wonder? We've been talking about a charter for a CCWG on this topic since at least the Marrakech meeting, maybe longer... There's a lot of cash in there now - would be great to know at a high level how new Board members envision it being allocated.
>
> I think we can assume the answer to this question will be ‘the board will do what the CCWG says, and doesn’t want to pre-empt it’. So not sure this question is the best use of our board time.
>
> David
Yes it’s a dead end for now
|
|
|