Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:15:44 -0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree with Avri -- not worth the time.
--c.a.
On 11/24/2010 09:10 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the past we have had meetings with the Board.
>
> Robin and I have been talking about Cartagena and we disagree on
> whether this is worth the time.
>
> At our last meeting, they seemed bored with the activity, some worked
> on their laptops the whole time, one reprimanded us for staff bashing
> and the chair told us we better have a really good reason for asking
> to meet with them again.
>
> Robin thinks it is important to meet with them because it is the only
> time we get to meet with them face to face without the intervening
> staff filter. She has a point there.
>
> She thinks there is a lot to be gained from engaging them in
> conversation.
>
> Nonetheless, I personally think it is a waste of what little face to
> face time we have that day.
>
> So do people think we want to petition to meet with them as part of
> the Stakeholder/Constituency day?
>
> If so what is our agenda. That has to be part of the request - so
> they can decide if it worth their time. They are busy people.
>
> One point there will be a meeting between the Board Structural
> Improvements Committee and the members of the Executive and Policy
> Committees at some point during the week to talk about charters etc,
> and as at the meeting last time in Brussels, I expect the whole Board
> would not be willing to talk with us about that.
>
> It might be late to ask, but the question came up.
>
> a.
--
Carlos A. Afonso
====================================
new/nuevo/novo e-mail: [log in to unmask]
====================================
|
|
|