Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:20:08 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I think that is a great question and I am stunned to learn that we have
that many new policy staffers...
Stephanie
On 2016-02-26 7:16, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
> I would like to talk with them about work flow. ICANN has hired 100
> policy staffers in the last year and has an enormous new capability
> for work flow, but we do not. There is no way to keep up with what is
> "in the queue" and "coming down the pike."
>
> I would expressly invite David Olive (as lead of ICANN's Policy
> Development Support Team) to be part of this discussion as well. How
> do we make the work load reasonable if we want the volunteer,
> multistakeholder model to continue? Is it based on ICANN capacity or
> stakeholder capacity?
>
> Best,
> Kathy
>
> On 2/26/2016 6:10 AM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> One regular event at ICANN meetings is that we get to meet the Board,
>> talk with them about and ask them whatever we want.
>>
>> The Board would, however, like to know in advance what we're going
>> to ask them, so they could better prepare for it.
>>
>> If you have suggestions for topics for our meeting with the Board in
>> Marrakech, please let me know as soon as possible (feel free to post
>> to the list or me directly, as you prefer).
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
|
|
|