Message-ID: |
|
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:32:51 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080109000100050109080205" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
As you may be aware, a hardy few of us have been participating in the
WHOIS conflicts with law volunteers group, a non-pdp that was set up to
see if it could improve the implementation of the WHOIS conflicts with
law policy. Documentation on this is available here
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/whois-conflicts-procedure-2014-05-22-en.
The working group has been quite fractitious, and Christopher Wilkinson
has already insisted on tabling a dissent or appendix with his views on
our inability to achieve concensus. I just sent my own dissent (does
not cover all the aspects of this that I find problematic, there just is
not enough time in the world) but it makes a coupld of points he does
not address. If anyone is interested in endorsing it, there may be a
way of doing that. However, the main report of the working group is
going to be released today, and I will be launching into drafting our
comments (unless someone else wants to grab the pen, if so please do!!)
The working group has a wiki, links to our work can be found here
https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-12-12-en. I will forward
the link to the full report once it is published today. Please join us
in crafting the response to this, I will start a pad shortly as soon as
we see the final report.
Kind regards,
Stephanie Perrin
NCUC
|
|
|