Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) |
Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 6 Aug 2016 19:45:35 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<p06230901d3cbbc58b66b@[192.168.1.2]> |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=windows-1252 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi,
> On Aug 6, 2016, at 6:19 PM, Dan Krimm <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
[SNIP]
>
> Avri also has a well-known track record of representing the full breadth of
> whatever constituency she represents in a particular role, and should be a
> very plausible candidate to represent the full GNSO including the
> commercial and other SGs. We want to put up a candidate who will be
> non-threatening to the full GNSO while still a vigorous advocate for GNSO
> interests, and a clear communicator to GAC about those interests (and to
> GNSO about GAC developments).
Very much agree with this, and also wanted to add that Avri was a member of the GAC/GNSO Consultative Group while she was on Council, and is already very familiar with what the job involves. She’s also very familiar with the going-ons of the GNSO, which would make her ideal from both a GNSO and a GAC perspective.
Thanks.
Amr
|
|
|