NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rudi Vansnick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Rudi Vansnick <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:07:26 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Fully agree with Andrew, once one obtains the right many others will stand up and request same right.

Rudi Vansnick


Op 14-feb-2013, om 03:53 heeft Andrew A. Adams het volgende geschreven:

> I seem to recall that our (NCUC, perhaps not NPOC) view on the Board's 
> decision to grant IOC/ICRC protections without a PDP represented the nose of 
> the camel in the tent and that this would likely lead to an attempt by the 
> rest of the IGO community to believe that they could expect similar 
> treatment). Our prediction is coming true, and this is the rest of the camel 
> being pushed into the tent. I fully support strong efforts to push for a 
> proper measured PDP approach to solving this issue and against these ad hoc 
> special treatments for special interests.
> 
> -- 
> Professor Andrew A Adams                      [log in to unmask]
> Professor at Graduate School of Business Administration,  and
> Deputy Director of the Centre for Business Information Ethics
> Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan       http://www.a-cubed.info/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2