NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Aug 2014 06:41:01 +0000
Reply-To:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
base64
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8
From:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Hi all
Mho is that the more we are evolving the more we will enter in the secret of gods.
Really intersting !
Cheers !
-Olévié-

Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]> a écrit :

>Hi Avri,
>
>Thanks, it is definitely an interesting reading :) and as NCSG we have to
>make some actions and that is coming soon.
>
>Best,
>
>Rafik
>
>
>2014-08-15 12:24 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Well the final plan for the Accountability process seems to be out.
>>
>> https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-14-en
>>
>> I think our next step is to start figuring out how we are going to work
>> with it.  We have done whatever we could to adjust it based on NCSG
>> principles, but at this point, I think that phase of the process is
>> pretty much over.  I believe that the effect of the various GNSO SG
>> letters was positive as I think the process is better now than the
>> earlier version we saw.  I think there is stuff I could quibble about,
>> but structurally the plan makes sense to me, and I think it can work as
>> a way for the community, both inside ICANN and the global community, to
>> do something to improve ICANN accountability.  I think it could achieve
>> a lot given the dependency of the transition process on the
>> accountability process.
>>
>> It looks like that at least for the next year, it is going to involve a
>> whole bunch of work and steady attention from the SG.  Between this and
>> the transition, we will be busy.  Not to mention the regular progression
>> of GNSO issues that are already important and hard enough.
>>
>> Speaking of the IANA Transtion and the  CWG charter, I have not seen the
>> final version yet, but I do believe that the ICG language was put in as
>> recommended by Milton.  A few of us (indeed I was not a lone voice) also
>> argued to keep the last line we had indicating that the IANA
>> accountability issues were in scope for the CWG on IANA transition. I
>> think we got that in, but I am not positive yet.  I am hoping the SOACs
>> approve the charter quickly as once that happens the group can start to
>> work.
>>
>>
>> avri
>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2