Hi,
On Sep 10, 2014, at 3:13 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I believe the whole point of the advisors is that they are not supposed to be part of or affiliated with the ICANN community. I’m assuming that includes RIRs.
>
Yes, that's how I understand it. Subject experts working with community experts.
PEG's mail list is archived <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/public-experts/>, can see some of the criteria they're discussing.
PEG wiki <https://community.icann.org/display/acctpublicxgrp/Public+Experts+Group+Home>
Adam
> I’m not aware of any qualifications apart from the ones list by Adam and the announcement, or any standards on diversity or qualification. The PEG probably have some sort of system worked out to make the selection.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
> On Sep 9, 2014, at 8:04 PM, Seun Ojedeji <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Hello Adam,
>>
>> Those are general headings, which I earlier saw. I am asking more about the required experience such as level of ICANN community plus other community experience, RIR experience, required qualification, region diversity, nationality etc.
>>
>> Generally asking what would the review team will lookout for to categorise an individual as being an expert on this particular topic of ICANN accountability.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> sent from Google nexus 4
>> kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>>
>> On 9 Sep 2014 18:52, "Adam" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 10, 2014, at 2:16 AM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>>
>> > Hello Edward,
>> >
>> > If I may ask, what is the expected/required characteristics of these so called "experts"?
>> >
>>
>>
>> Hi Sean,
>>
>> areas of expertise are on the webpage Ed gave the link to <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en> They are:
>>
>> "The areas identified for expertise include:
>>
>> • Internet Technical Operations
>> • International Organizational Reviews
>> • Global Accountability Tools and Metrics
>> • Jurisprudence / Accountability Mechanisms
>> • Internet Consumer Protection (including privacy, human rights and property rights concerns)
>> • Economics (Marketplace and Competition)
>> • Global Ethics Frameworks
>> • Operational, Finance and Process
>> • Board Governance
>> • Transparency
>> • Risk Management
>> • Governmental Engagement and Relations
>> • Multistakeholder Governance"
>>
>> Adam
>>
>>
>>
>> > Thanks for the effort
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > sent from Google nexus 4
>> > kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>> >
>> > On 9 Sep 2014 17:23, "Edward Morris" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > While ICANN takes public comments on their top down Accountability plan, the plan itself moves forward. To their credit, the Public Experts Group will be announcing in the next day or so that the deadline for nominations of “experts” for the ICANN Accountability & Governance Coordination Group will be extended from tomorrow to at least the end of the month, if not a few days longer.
>> >
>> > As a reminder, the Call for Candidates can be found here:
>> >
>> > https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en
>> >
>> > In a top down process that largely is horrid this Call is an opportunity for those of us on the bottom of the bottom up process to be heard. I’ve been reaching out to people, collecting c.v.’s and trying to put together some candidates that would reflect the views of the noncommercial community. You’ll be surprised at how many respected professionals have no idea what ICANN is or that there even is a field of knowledge called internet governance. I’m finding that once educated, though, people are generally willing to consider serving.
>> >
>> > A special call out to NCSG members in Asia, Latin America and Africa. The members of the Public Experts Group are all from the United States and northern Europe. It would be particularly useful if you could come up with potential “experts” in the delineated categories from your regions and submit those names to ICANN. It would be great to have a bit more geographic diversity in the candidate pool.
>> >
>> > Thanks for considering.
>> >
>> > Ed
>> >
>>
>
|
