NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2014 04:53:17 -0300
Reply-To:
Enrique Chaparro <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Enrique Chaparro <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
Sure. My objections do not mean that I oppose to NCSG
adopting a rough consensus affirmative decision. That's
the way things have been done since the times I used to
work with the PD-11/63 :)

With regard to those objections, please allow me some hours
to write them down. I need to finish the drafts for a couple
of papers before taking some sleep... and it's almost 5 A.M.
here.

Regards,

ATOM RSS1 RSS2