Avri
Because the ICG is already a limited group with fixed numbers of "representatives" of different stakeholder groups, why can't the CCWG be more like an open working group? I understand the concerns about imbalance in representation, on the other hand, I think limiting access to a few people will prevent ideas from being brought into the process and may provide a false consensus.
Is the CCWG still talking about limiting participation in this way?
--MM
-----Original Message-----
From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 10:42 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Fwd: [] Draft Agenda Meeting Monday 28 July 2014, 13.00 UTC - CWG on IST
Hi,
Attached is the agenda for the charter drafting team's next meeting and the draft chart for the ICANN Cross Community WG on the IANA Stewardship Transition
avri
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Draft Agenda Meeting Monday 28 July 2014,
13.00 UTC
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:40:52 +0000
From: Bart Boswinkel <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Dear all,
Please find included the draft agenda for the DT meeting Monday 28 July,
13.00 UTC.
Kind regards,
Bart
*Draft Agenda*
1. Welcome and roll-call
2. Confirmation of meeting notes and action items (included in Annex A) 3. Timeline Approval of charter and call/appointment of volunteers WG
(In order to adopt charter in time, organize membership of the WG
itself and have a first full-blown face to face meeting in LA, the
draft charter needs to be completed by 14 August, order of approval
will be ccNSO( 21 August), ALAC ( 26 August), SSAC ( 2 September)
and GNSO ( 4 September) , see Annex B)) 4. Timelines and coordination with ICG 5. Run-through latest version of draft charter 6. AOB 7. Closure
*Annex A Meeting notes and action items DT meeting 21 July* */Notes / Action Items 21/7/*
* ICG timeline is still tentative and will need to be further
discussed and considered by ICG - issues such as public comment and
consultation has not been factored in
* Outreach / education needed on how naming relationship with IANA
differs from other communities which may also be reflected in
proposals that will eventually be submitted
* Not the role of the ICG to develop proposals or choose from
competing proposals according to charter
* Draft timeline does not allow for resolution of possible issues or
testing, incl. no transition window
/*Composition of ccWG*/
* Members (from chartering organizations)- consider keeping it
relatively small to ensure being able to make progress (min. 2, max
3-5 from each chartering organization). Observers - consider leaving
it open (can participate in conversations, but not responsible for
getting the work done).
* SO/AC/SG/C should consider opening up their processes so that others
interested could also join as members who are not necessarily formal
members of SO/AC/SG/C
* Should this CWG redirect any requests from other communities to
participate to their respective groups?
* Proposal to have chartering organizations have min. 2, max of 5 of
representatives on the CWG. Open to observers from all communities.
Make CWG operations as transparent and open as possible for all,
both with regard to F2F as well as online meetings.
* Observers can provide input, but should decisions need to be made,
only named members can provide input at that stage. - make sure to
clarify this in the charter
*/Public consultations/*
* At least one, if not two public comment forums
/*Involvement of the GAC*/
* Reach out to the GAC and re-invite them (noting renewed committment
to participate in community efforts following increase in GAC
membership in ICG)
/*Development of workplan and timelines*/
* Consider how to provide feedback to ICG on timeline (end of year
deadline may not be feasible)
* Consider having input ready following ICANN meeting in Marrakech as
a possible alternative - what are other possible milestones in
interim timeframe? Consider providing that feedback to ICG.
* Should work on development of charter be done in parallel with
initial work of CWG or does charter need to be approved first? Might
be difficult for CWG to commence without charter nailed down. Maybe
some of the administrative elements could be commenced earlier, but
the substantive work can only begin once the charter has been approved.
* Staff to develop draft timeline for public consultations by next
week's meeting
/*Charter*/
(Edits in real time)
* The focus is on names but will not be limited exclusively to names.
* Further comment on email list:
o Accountability
o Role of Maintainer
*Annex B Charter Approval Timelines*
/*Possible timing for GNSO Council consideration / adoption of charter:*/
* 4 September GNSO Council meeting - motion & charter would need to be
submitted by 25 August at the latest to be considered
* 25 September GNSO Council meeting - motion & charter would need to
be submitted by 15 September at the latest to be considered
* 15 October GNSO Council meeting (LA meeting) - motion & charter
would need to be submitted by 5 October at the latest to be considered
/*Possible timing for ccNSO consideration:*/
* 21 August
* 25 September
* 21 October ( LA meeting)
In case necessary e-mail vote (will take one week to vote)
Secondly, call for volunteers will take 3 weeks (call-for volunteers 1-2 weeks, appointment by Council through email approval)
/*Possible timing for ALAC consideration:*/
* The deadlines for the ALAC (after one week's review by the At-Large
Ad-hoc WG on the Transition of US Government Stewardship of the IANA
Function WG) are:
* 26 August ALAC meeting - motion & charter would need to be submitted
to the ALAC by 22 August at the latest to be considered and to
At-Large Ad-hoc WG on the Transition of the US Government
Stewardship of the IANA Function WG by 15 August)
* 23 September ALAC meeting - motion & charter would need to be
submitted to the ALAC by 19 September at the latest to be considered
and to At-Large Ad-hoc WG on the Transition of the US Government
Stewardship of the IANA Function WG by 12 September)
/*Possible timing for SSAC consideration / adoption of charter:*/
* 16-18 September SSAC Workshop - motion & charter would need to be
submitted by 02 September at the latest to be considered
* 14 October SSAC meeting (LA meeting) - motion & charter would need
to be submitted by 30 September at the latest to be considered
* 13 November SSAC meeting - motion & charter would need to be
submitted by 30 October at the latest to be considered
|
